|
Post by Chicago (Craig-Admin) on Oct 6, 2015 16:12:01 GMT
Extension Guidelines:
Player must be either UFA or RFA (there current contract is up) Have played 50 games the past season Each team may extend 1 player per year Extensions can be given 1-3 years in length of contract.
Salary will be based on their ranking:
1-5: $20 Million 6-10: $19 Million 11-15: $18 Million 16-20: $17 Million 21-25: $16 Million 26-30: $15 Million 31-40: $14 Million 41-50: $13 Million 51-60: $12 Million 60-75: $11 Million 76-90: $10 Million 91-105: $9 Million 106-120: $8 Million 121-135: $7 Million 136-155: $6 Million 156-180: $5 Million 181-200: $4 Million 201-225: $3 Million 226-250: $2 Million 251-300: $1.5 Million 300+: $1.2 Million
|
|
|
Post by Brooklyn (Alex) on Oct 7, 2015 10:36:43 GMT
Extension Guidelines: "Player must be either UFA or RFA (there current contract is up)" Wow! Pretty expenssive excercise, but guess it makes sense :-)
Can you pls clarify if this means that someone on RFA contract can be extended before other managers have a chance to match via RFA?
Eg- Wiggins contract is up. Can he be extended under these rules OR all GM's have an option to give an offer and the team that owns hit matches the highest one?
Thanks a lot,
Alex PS- is there a min number of games played in the year the contract expires (ie otherwise if the player was hurt then his value might be artificially low)? Say if the player does not play in at least 40-50 games we look at the season before as a benchmark?
|
|
|
Post by Michael (Boston) on Oct 7, 2015 11:12:22 GMT
Have played 50 games the past season You can't even extend Wiggins or Durant if they get hurt? Should be previous season's ranking in my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Brooklyn (Alex) on Oct 7, 2015 13:47:26 GMT
No my suggestion was just to use the year bf (in case they played less than x number of games last year) as a bechmark for injured players. Otherwise one could extend a player like Durant for 1M if he is injured- like many studs were last season
|
|
|
Post by Chicago (Craig-Admin) on Oct 7, 2015 14:40:32 GMT
Extension Guidelines: "Player must be either UFA or RFA (there current contract is up)" Wow! Pretty expenssive excercise, but guess it makes sense :-)
Can you pls clarify if this means that someone on RFA contract can be extended before other managers have a chance to match via RFA?
Eg- Wiggins contract is up. Can he be extended under these rules OR all GM's have an option to give an offer and the team that owns hit matches the highest one?
Thanks a lot,
Alex PS- is there a min number of games played in the year the contract expires (ie otherwise if the player was hurt then his value might be artificially low)? Say if the player does not play in at least 40-50 games we look at the season before as a benchmark?
They have to have played in atleast 50 games to be extended. The team has the option to offer a player who is a RFA an extension before RFAs begin (hope that statement makes sense) Have played 50 games the past season You can't even extend Wiggins or Durant if they get hurt? Should be previous season's ranking in my opinion. We can go back to the previous season if they did not play atleast 50 games during the current one. No my suggestion was just to use the year bf (in case they played less than x number of games last year) as a bechmark for injured players. Otherwise one could extend a player like Durant for 1M if he is injured- like many studs were last season No way anyone will get extended for that cheap with a 50 games played minimum limit.
|
|
|
Post by Michael (Boston) on Oct 7, 2015 14:56:10 GMT
What about a Derrick Rose type situation?
i.e. he was out of form but played 53 games?
Rose would have been risky through, but would still be a steal at say 4.5 million.
|
|
|
Post by Chicago (Craig-Admin) on Oct 7, 2015 15:04:07 GMT
What about a Derrick Rose type situation? i.e. he was out of form but played 53 games? Rose would have been risky through, but would still be a steal at say 4.5 million. there is a lot of risk with players like that. was debating between making it 50 or 56 games? 56 games is about 70% of a NBA Season would make it so no one gets too heavily discounted
|
|
|
Post by Brooklyn (Alex) on Oct 7, 2015 20:40:53 GMT
"The team has the option to offer a player who is a RFA an extension before RFAs begin (hope that statement makes sense)"
Not sure I get this- does this mean we avoid RFA if we extend the player under the rules above. Guess what comes first- UFA and then RFA?
Basically if I have a stud and he is up for RFA I can extend him bf RFA if my understanding is correct?
So I own Wiggins and want to keep him. When his contract is up I post as if he was UFA and extend him as per rules above instead is "risking" a high price tag via RFA? Is that correct?
Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by Chicago (Craig-Admin) on Oct 7, 2015 22:55:30 GMT
yes unless anyone has a better suggestion for an alternative?
|
|
|
Post by Brooklyn (Alex) on Oct 8, 2015 8:10:26 GMT
OK for me- it actually makes to think twice. Good RFA's will not be cheap to extend and you might be better off testing the market (ie adds another angle which is what contract leagues should be all about).
Thanks for the explanation!
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota (Chris) on Feb 7, 2016 21:43:29 GMT
Base the extention cost off of their fantrax ranking for their respective positions from the past two years, taking the higher ranked year and making that AAV the cost for the contract extension.
For example, if Kevin Durant ranked 35th last year (injury season) and 2nd this year, you would use this years ranking for the extension cost.
|
|